Arizona state Representative Mark Finchem reports Arizona is finally getting its audit in Maricopa County, which will look “at every ballot.”
Where is Pulitzer? Haven’t heard anything about him lately.Doesn’t sound like Pulitzer will be used. That would be fast and I like the idea of him being independent. The ballots that were of different paper and ink should still be easily identifiable either way. The electronic evidence is already documented and incontrovertible.
I read an article a couple of days ago, he said he didn’t think they would use him. He claimed he didn’t think Senate Republicans really wanted to find the problem and that they had reservations about using him for some reason.Where is Pulitzer? Haven’t heard anything about him lately.
i heard the same thing. i am at the point of i can't hear any more words. ACTION ACTION ACTION.I read an article a couple of days ago, he said he didn’t think they would use him. He claimed he didn’t think Senate Republicans really wanted to find the problem and that they had reservations about using him for some reason.
Check out his youtube videos on the subject. Basically they (even republicans) wanted Pulitzer to only sample 10% and he said he could not do a good job with that and would not do it at all unless they agreed for him to do 100%. Sounds to me like they(including republicans) are trying to do a half ass audit that will not find anything.Where is Pulitzer? Haven’t heard anything about him lately.
He said he was out...but that was BEFORE they agreed to 100% ... hopefully they will get a clue and ask PULITZER to do the FORENSIC AUDIT.Pulitzer says he is out and explains it on his blog...I wonder why Steve didn't ask about who was doing the audit..In the past Warroom Bannon was always concerned about who was going to do the audit..now its crickets
I’m hopeful they’ll expose mass fraud, but doubtful our GOP will do much to rally law-abiding citizens on the merits of facts uncovered in this audit.
If you get to the point to absolutely prove up the "fractional voting" capability within the voting machines (whether used or not) start to make the case that this fact alone jeopardizes the principle of one voter - one vote. If my vote is altered up or down or could be this is as egregious a violation as unbalanced sizes of congressional districts. In the 1950s the Warren Court required redistricting to equalize population to preserve the principle of one man one vote. Voting machines that calculate do the very same thing. This needs to be the basis of a SCOTUS case with the Warren Court precedent. I think SCOTUS would take this case. If proven up in Maricopa County SCOTUS could make a broad nationwide decision. I want the War Room to take up this aspect of the "machine issue". I know Steve is not attracted to the digital machine issues. But this aspect of the issue puts a real clear implication that is easy to understand. Eyes should not glaze over is vote counting equity is the issue. GOOD FOR THIS BIG TIME BECAUSE IT IS A WINNER!!!!!!