HERE WHY ----- Joe Biden is permanently disqualified from holding any public office in the U.S. Federal Government

  • Join War Room Forum!

    Welcome Deplorable! Please take a moment to Sign Up for a free account so you can join in on the LIVE CHAT and forum DISCUSSIONS.

    Sign Up    Live Chat Login


caroletucotte

Active Member
Feb 13, 2021
513
174
43
1614055192501.png



-------- JOE BIDEN DISQUALIFIED -------


UNITED STATES CODE:
Joe Biden is permanently disqualified from holding any public office in the
U.S. Federal Government

Joe Biden is prohibited from holding public
office in the US government—Here’s why!
By his own admission, then Vice President Joe Biden used
upwards of $1 billion of US government loan guarantees in
a bribery coercion scheme to threaten the Ukraine president
to immediately terminate the Prosecutor General who was investigating the corrupt practices of Burisma Holdings, as
well as the involvement of board director Hunter Biden.
This criminal act constitutes a federal felony crime and
disqualifies Biden from holding public office.


All the hard evidence and applicable laws follow in this straightforward legal analysis.

First, here’s Biden’s unequivocal admission of his crime on video


Federal Corrupt Practices Act

Now, here is the relevant section from the FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT, that is codified as United States Federal Law, which strictly “prohibits U.S. citizens and entities from bribing foreign government officials to benefit their business interests”.

15 U.S. Code § 78dd–1 – Prohibited foreign trade practices by issuers

The applicable section of the U.S. Code can be found in 15 U.S. Code § 78dd–1 as follows:
1614055545822.png



Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78dd-1

U.S. Department of Justice Guidance

Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Justice has published “An Overview” which spells out that what VP Joe Biden did by threatening to withhold loan guarantees to the Ukraine was in blatant violation of U.S. Federal Law.
The Fraud Section of the Criminal Division of the DoJ makes it clear what constitutes a violation of the FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT as follows.
1614055691372.png






Source: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreign-corrupt-practices-act#:~:text=The%20Foreign%20Corrupt%20Practices%20Act,in%20obtaining

%20or%20retaining%20business.

Code of Federal Regulations
Next, there is the pertinent section of Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) which explicitly states that no employee of the U.S. Federal Government should use their public office for private gain. The following excerpt was taken from: 5 CFR § 2635.702 – Use of public office for private gain.
(a) Inducement or coercion of benefits. An employee shall not use or permit the use of his Government position or title or any authority associated with his public office in a manner that is intended to coerce or induce another person, including a subordinate, to provide any benefit, financial or otherwise, to himself or to friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity.



Here’s a screenshot of the same CFR regulation that is directly applicable to Joe Biden’s official misconduct while VPOTUS and acting on behalf of his son Hunter Biden in his official capacity as member of the Board of Directors of Burisma Holding Limited, a Ukrainian Company.
1614055833437.png






Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2635.702




18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses


Then there is the federal statute codified by the U.S. Code concerning the “Bribery of public officials and witnesses”. Here again Vice President Biden clearly acted in contravention of both 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(1) as to the giver, and § 201(b)(2) as to the recipient, in the crime of bribery of a pubic official.


18 U.S.C. § 201 proscribes bribery and the acceptance of certain gratuities. The U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, 526 U.S. 398, 404-405 (1999), describes the two crimes as follows:

“The first crime, described in § 201(b)(1) as to the giver, and § 201(b)(2) as to the recipient, is bribery, which requires a showing that something of value was corruptly given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the giver) or corruptly demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to be received or accepted by a public official (as to the recipient) with intent, inter alia, ‘to influence any official act’ (giver) or in return for ‘being influenced in the performance of any official act’ (recipient). The second crime, defined in § 201(c)(1)(A) as to the giver, and § 201(c)(1)(B) as to the recipient, is illegal gratuity, which requires a showing that something of value was given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the giver), or demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to be received or accepted by a public official (as to the recipient), ‘for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official.’


The distinguishing feature of each crime is its intent element. Bribery requires intent ‘to influence’ an official act or ‘to be influenced’ in an official act, while illegal gratuity requires only that the gratuity be given or accepted ‘for or because of’ an official act. In other words, for bribery there must be a quid pro quo a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act. An illegal gratuity, on the other hand, may constitute merely a reward for some future act that the public official will take (and may already have determined to take), or for a past act that he has already taken.”


The U.S. Office of Government Ethics does not render opinions on 18 U.S.C. § 201, but may provide links to relevant information about the topic, when appropriate.


The screenshot posted below was taken from: : https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreign-corrupt-practices-act 1614055990881.png


Concealment of Vice President Joe Biden’s senatorial records

There’s one more serious transgression of federal law that Joe Biden is guilty of: the deliberate concealment of his senatorial records. Those records are currently housed at the University of Delaware and Biden himself can permit their release.

In this particular regard, Biden’s refusal to release those public records is a brazen violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2071 which concerns the “Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally” of government records, documents, files, etc. The letter of the law can be read in the following screen capture taken from the Cornell Law School website. The disqualification clause is highlighted in blue.
1614056292106.png



Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071


KEY POINT: Joe Biden isn’t the first Democrat POTUS candidate to be disqualified from holding public office because of concealment or destruction of government records. Hillary Clinton was also prohibited (according to the law of the land) from running for President prior the 2016 election because of the her intentional removal and destruction of official government email correspondence. See: Sometimes the hard truth appears in the funniest places … like a Law Library.
Conclusion

Joe Biden, acting in his official capacity of Vice President of the United States of America, bribed the Ukraine government in order to compel President Petro Poroshenko to fire the General Prosecutor. This criminal act was carried out with the explicit intent to terminate the ongoing criminal investigation of Burisma Holdings Limited, as well as to stop the investigation and avert the prosecution of his son—Board Director Hunter Biden.
Various sections of the U.S. Code describe this official behavior as criminal and, therefore, subject to prosecution as well as disqualification to hold public office in the US government. Given the extreme seriousness of Biden’s admitted crime and flagrant breach of the public trust, the Democrat POTUS nominee is effectively barred from running for any public office until his criminal case is properly prosecuted and adjudicated. Moreover, Biden’s premeditated concealment of his senatorial records further adds to this open-and-shut case which necessitates his permanent prohibition to hold public office.


C A S E C L O S E D !

STATE OF THE NATION ARTICLE
August 15, 2020
 

Attachments

  • 1614056241914.png
    1614056241914.png
    135.4 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: 1/2planetaway

UniqueCritique

Well-known Member
Jan 28, 2021
559
633
93
Here is the thing about that. Thanks for the specifics. I saw that online several times. There is a Hannity piece that in 2019
when the Dems were looking for something to impeach Trump with they were going to use this Biden action and say Trump
did it!! I tweeted Hannity about it. I did save the Hannity video. I'll look for it and let you know.
 

UniqueCritique

Well-known Member
Jan 28, 2021
559
633
93
Me again. Today I contacted House minority leader McCarthy, my reps & McConnell.
Nancy Pelosi is using her position as Speaker to appoint her choice of an investigator,
not impartial, to continue her vendetta of hatred to charge Trump of a crime. She is a
suspect, will need to be deposed herself, She cannot pick her own judge and jury. She needs
to step back & recuse herself. Is there anything that can be done about it?? She & AOC
do whatever they want & get away with it. Enough is enough.

I'd like to get that email & some other Pelosi-type I have posted to u to see what you think.
 

UniqueCritique

Well-known Member
Jan 28, 2021
559
633
93
HERE is the Hannity video Oct 2019 (3) Hannity on Democrats' 'Soviet-style' impeachment inquiry - YouTube

Sean:
This video is from Oct 22, 2019.

You know that1 BILLION DOLLARS Joe Biden was going to hold up if a certain prosecutor
in the Ukraine was not terminated? The one who was investigating his son, Hunter?

Well just before 6:42 min that 1 BILLION DOLLARS shows up on this video. Only it is attributed
to President Donald Trump in their search for an impeachable offense !!!!!
 

UniqueCritique

Well-known Member
Jan 28, 2021
559
633
93
One more email:

Dear Representative McCarthy:

I am contacting you because of your Minority Leader position in the HOUSE.

Nancy Pelosi needs to recuse herself from any and all transactions in the investigation of the EVENTS
at the Capitol and the Events leading up to January 6, 2021. With her position as Majority Leader Nancy
Pelosi on her own picked a person who would investigate. That person should resign that position for
that reason.

An IMPARTIAL person or persons should be selected for any further depositions, which would include the
depositions on Speaker Pelosi, who is a suspect as well.

NANCY PELOSI is using her position as Speaker to continue a vendetta against Donald Trump. She alone
set up an unconstitutional impeachment vote with NO hearings when VP Pence would not fire him. She
then picked a MANAGER & team to proceed. With an acquittal by the Senate, the Speaker, who called the
senators "cowards" on video, is again planning to hand pick who does this investigation.

As an American, I am standing up AGAINST Speaker Pelosi again leading the charge, this time to try to have
criminal charges brought against Donald Trump.

Please let me know that you can bring up this matter in Congress. If not, I need to know how & hope you would
proceed getting this done.

I am represented by Rep.Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Senators Patty Murray & Maria Cantwell who I will also
be contacting, as well as Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell.

Sincerely
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: j.wntworth

1/2planetaway

Well-known Member
Jan 19, 2021
798
818
93
View attachment 2126


-------- JOE BIDEN DISQUALIFIED -------


UNITED STATES CODE:
Joe Biden is permanently disqualified from holding any public office in the
U.S. Federal Government

Joe Biden is prohibited from holding public
office in the US government—Here’s why!
By his own admission, then Vice President Joe Biden used
upwards of $1 billion of US government loan guarantees in
a bribery coercion scheme to threaten the Ukraine president
to immediately terminate the Prosecutor General who was investigating the corrupt practices of Burisma Holdings, as
well as the involvement of board director Hunter Biden.
This criminal act constitutes a federal felony crime and
disqualifies Biden from holding public office.


All the hard evidence and applicable laws follow in this straightforward legal analysis.

First, here’s Biden’s unequivocal admission of his crime on video


Federal Corrupt Practices Act

Now, here is the relevant section from the FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT, that is codified as United States Federal Law, which strictly “prohibits U.S. citizens and entities from bribing foreign government officials to benefit their business interests”.

15 U.S. Code § 78dd–1 – Prohibited foreign trade practices by issuers

The applicable section of the U.S. Code can be found in 15 U.S. Code § 78dd–1 as follows: View attachment 2127


Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78dd-1

U.S. Department of Justice Guidance

Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Justice has published “An Overview” which spells out that what VP Joe Biden did by threatening to withhold loan guarantees to the Ukraine was in blatant violation of U.S. Federal Law.
The Fraud Section of the Criminal Division of the DoJ makes it clear what constitutes a violation of the FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT as follows.
View attachment 2128





Source: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreign-corrupt-practices-act#:~:text=The%20Foreign%20Corrupt%20Practices%20Act,in%20obtaining

%20or%20retaining%20business.

Code of Federal Regulations
Next, there is the pertinent section of Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) which explicitly states that no employee of the U.S. Federal Government should use their public office for private gain. The following excerpt was taken from: 5 CFR § 2635.702 – Use of public office for private gain.
(a) Inducement or coercion of benefits. An employee shall not use or permit the use of his Government position or title or any authority associated with his public office in a manner that is intended to coerce or induce another person, including a subordinate, to provide any benefit, financial or otherwise, to himself or to friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity.



Here’s a screenshot of the same CFR regulation that is directly applicable to Joe Biden’s official misconduct while VPOTUS and acting on behalf of his son Hunter Biden in his official capacity as member of the Board of Directors of Burisma Holding Limited, a Ukrainian Company. View attachment 2129





Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2635.702




18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses


Then there is the federal statute codified by the U.S. Code concerning the “Bribery of public officials and witnesses”. Here again Vice President Biden clearly acted in contravention of both 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(1) as to the giver, and § 201(b)(2) as to the recipient, in the crime of bribery of a pubic official.


18 U.S.C. § 201 proscribes bribery and the acceptance of certain gratuities. The U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, 526 U.S. 398, 404-405 (1999), describes the two crimes as follows:

“The first crime, described in § 201(b)(1) as to the giver, and § 201(b)(2) as to the recipient, is bribery, which requires a showing that something of value was corruptly given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the giver) or corruptly demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to be received or accepted by a public official (as to the recipient) with intent, inter alia, ‘to influence any official act’ (giver) or in return for ‘being influenced in the performance of any official act’ (recipient). The second crime, defined in § 201(c)(1)(A) as to the giver, and § 201(c)(1)(B) as to the recipient, is illegal gratuity, which requires a showing that something of value was given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the giver), or demanded, sought, received, accepted, or agreed to be received or accepted by a public official (as to the recipient), ‘for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official.’


The distinguishing feature of each crime is its intent element. Bribery requires intent ‘to influence’ an official act or ‘to be influenced’ in an official act, while illegal gratuity requires only that the gratuity be given or accepted ‘for or because of’ an official act. In other words, for bribery there must be a quid pro quo a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act. An illegal gratuity, on the other hand, may constitute merely a reward for some future act that the public official will take (and may already have determined to take), or for a past act that he has already taken.”


The U.S. Office of Government Ethics does not render opinions on 18 U.S.C. § 201, but may provide links to relevant information about the topic, when appropriate.


The screenshot posted below was taken from: : https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreign-corrupt-practices-act View attachment 2130


Concealment of Vice President Joe Biden’s senatorial records

There’s one more serious transgression of federal law that Joe Biden is guilty of: the deliberate concealment of his senatorial records. Those records are currently housed at the University of Delaware and Biden himself can permit their release.

In this particular regard, Biden’s refusal to release those public records is a brazen violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2071 which concerns the “Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally” of government records, documents, files, etc. The letter of the law can be read in the following screen capture taken from the Cornell Law School website. The disqualification clause is highlighted in blue.
View attachment 2133


Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071


KEY POINT: Joe Biden isn’t the first Democrat POTUS candidate to be disqualified from holding public office because of concealment or destruction of government records. Hillary Clinton was also prohibited (according to the law of the land) from running for President prior the 2016 election because of the her intentional removal and destruction of official government email correspondence. See: Sometimes the hard truth appears in the funniest places … like a Law Library.
Conclusion

Joe Biden, acting in his official capacity of Vice President of the United States of America, bribed the Ukraine government in order to compel President Petro Poroshenko to fire the General Prosecutor. This criminal act was carried out with the explicit intent to terminate the ongoing criminal investigation of Burisma Holdings Limited, as well as to stop the investigation and avert the prosecution of his son—Board Director Hunter Biden.
Various sections of the U.S. Code describe this official behavior as criminal and, therefore, subject to prosecution as well as disqualification to hold public office in the US government. Given the extreme seriousness of Biden’s admitted crime and flagrant breach of the public trust, the Democrat POTUS nominee is effectively barred from running for any public office until his criminal case is properly prosecuted and adjudicated. Moreover, Biden’s premeditated concealment of his senatorial records further adds to this open-and-shut case which necessitates his permanent prohibition to hold public office.


C A S E C L O S E D !

STATE OF THE NATION ARTICLE
August 15, 2020
Whoopy Doo....so who is going to remove or handcuff him??? no point saying all this if there is no action taken....he is still the President...
 

Stop Being Delusional

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2021
1,932
1,923
113
I agree he is not legally the President...but here we are. The elites Got their man in, they always do (except once) in the past century. Nobody is going to stop it. Nobody will remove him. He is the president, an illegal one, but who is going to do anything? The elites control every section of the government so?

If Trump, the man with the most power before, could not take them down or arrest anyone, how can an ordinary citizen do it, again through courts and congress That are still corrupt. I think it is going to take at least 80% of Americans to fight them and not through courts to get anywhere. They are corrupt. That is why they let pedophiles off all the time.

I bid you luck my friend!
 

UniqueCritique

Well-known Member
Jan 28, 2021
559
633
93
I agree he is not legally the President...but here we are. The elites Got their man in, they always do (except once) in the past century. Nobody is going to stop it. Nobody will remove him. He is the president, an illegal one, but who is going to do anything? The elites control every section of the government so?

If Trump, the man with the most power before, could not take them down or arrest anyone, how can an ordinary citizen do it, again through courts and congress That are still corrupt. I think it is going to take at least 80% of Americans to fight them and not through courts to get anywhere. They are corrupt. That is why they let pedophiles off all the time.

I bid you luck my friend!
I agree the courts & congress are corrupt or too "just let me get through this day" scared, I feel so discouraged. It is just like with twitter though. Censored, we find Parler. Parler shut down, we find GAB or Warroom forum. We just keep putting the TRUTH out there. We are gaining strength and volume. I do not think our country CAN SURVIVE until 2024. They are wrecking it too fast. SO, we NEED to reach people NOW. And PREY for Mike Lindell!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: j.wntworth

j.wntworth

Active Member
Dec 28, 2020
118
214
43
One more email:

Dear Representative McCarthy:

I am contacting you because of your Minority Leader position in the HOUSE.

Nancy Pelosi needs to recuse herself from any and all transactions in the investigation of the EVENTS
at the Capitol and the Events leading up to January 6, 2021. With her position as Majority Leader Nancy
Pelosi on her own picked a person who would investigate. That person should resign that position for
that reason.

An IMPARTIAL person or persons should be selected for any further depositions, which would include the
depositions on Speaker Pelosi, who is a suspect as well.

NANCY PELOSI is using her position as Speaker to continue a vendetta against Donald Trump. She alone
set up an unconstitutional impeachment vote with NO hearings when VP Pence would not fire him. She
then picked a MANAGER & team to proceed. With an acquittal by the Senate, the Speaker, who called the
senators "cowards" on video, is again planning to hand pick who does this investigation.

As an American, I am standing up AGAINST Speaker Pelosi again leading the charge, this time to try to have
criminal charges brought against Donald Trump.

Please let me know that you can bring up this matter in Congress. If not, I need to know how & hope you would
proceed getting this done.

I am represented by Rep.Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Senators Patty Murray & Maria Cantwell who I will also
be contacting, as well as Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell.

Sincerely
It seems you have more courage than does SCOTUS. Have a law degree by any chance?
 

j.wntworth

Active Member
Dec 28, 2020
118
214
43
I agree he is not legally the President...but here we are. The elites Got their man in, they always do (except once) in the past century. Nobody is going to stop it. Nobody will remove him. He is the president, an illegal one, but who is going to do anything? The elites control every section of the government so?

If Trump, the man with the most power before, could not take them down or arrest anyone, how can an ordinary citizen do it, again through courts and congress That are still corrupt. I think it is going to take at least 80% of Americans to fight them and not through courts to get anywhere. They are corrupt. That is why they let pedophiles off all the time.

I bid you luck my friend!
What if 75,000,000 voters began a new party with plank # 1, Term Limits? Drain the $$donations from RINO's, who are now the RNC. Do you think the middle working class of Hispanics would get on board - seeing the immediate damage being done to their lives by Biden? What are your thoughts about a fresh start? Can open revolt be avoided at this juncture?
 

j.wntworth

Active Member
Dec 28, 2020
118
214
43
I agree the courts & congress are corrupt or too "just let me get through this day" scared, I feel so discouraged. It is just like with twitter though. Censored, we find Parler. Parler shut down, we find GAB or Warroom forum. We just keep putting the TRUTH out there. We are gaining strength and volume. I do not think our country CAN SURVIVE until 2024. They are wrecking it too fast. SO, we NEED to reach people NOW. And PREY for Mike Lindell!!!
And after we pray, send an email of serious support to Mike. He needs to feel our presence. Maybe buy another pillow to gift someone at Christmas. The Dems give real hard currency to their people, not just talk.
 

Stop Being Delusional

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2021
1,932
1,923
113
What if 75,000,000 voters began a new party with plank # 1, Term Limits? Drain the $$donations from RINO's, who are now the RNC. Do you think the middle working class of Hispanics would get on board - seeing the immediate damage being done to their lives by Biden? What are your thoughts about a fresh start? Can open revolt be avoided at this juncture?
What about the millions of illegals that will pour into America before 2024? We will be over ran and no way they will vote for our party, they’re criminals, most anyways

As far as starting new parties, it would only separate people more.I think this brainwashing propaganda of separating everyone in the last four years has destroyed all efforts to unite and take down the entire government, which was the elites plan. Before trump everyone got along, trump gets in and everyone is against each other. Msm propaganda. I stated before I am with no party. Not a republican, not a democrat, not a liberal, not in The middle, I don‘t like parties. I have my own thoughts and tbh don’t trust any political party, never have, never will until the government is gone and replaced with constitutional people. There are many things I dislike about what each party stands for. Democrats fight and take over everything, like schools, republicans don’t do anything. Democrats always fight and win, republicans give up without a fight. Democrats are communists, treat people like crap etc etc, but so do republicans. And I am not talking about the people, but the politicians who pick which side they are running on. I stand with my forefathers and my ancestors, and I will leave it at that. America needs to turn back to 1776 “Christian” America and not whatever the hell this is now (I know what it is but can’t say) sure as hell isn‘t America when they won’t even start CPAC with Christian/Catholic prayer, nor even have one. f*** ’em.

Also if you know their plans, agenda 2030, NWO, all that stuff, you then know there will be no way out without war at some point in the future. We would be fighting against bolshevik communists.
 

War Room Live Chat

Hey Deplorable! Join us...

Never miss out. Join in on all that our community as to offer!

Sign Me Up!

War Room Podcast

War Room Live Chat