My Pillow Does NOT need to be served to answer

  • Join War Room Forum!

    Welcome Deplorable! Please take a moment to Sign Up for a free account so you can join in on the LIVE CHAT and forum DISCUSSIONS.

    Sign Up    Live Chat Login


mari5212

New Member
Feb 23, 2021
11
3
3
Mike Lindell does not have to wait to be served. He can RESPOND since the lawsuit has already been filed. At that point there wil be MOTIONS OF one type or another (answer, demurrer, motion to strike etc). I recommend that Lindell NOT get a big law firm, otherwise known as BIG LAW. Most of those lawyers are not great trial lawyers. They are insiders or establishment. They cater to corporations who can afford them. On the other hand, top trial lawyers (Plaintiffs lawyers) are far better on the higher end (that is, lawyers who regularly handle BIG cases with big payouts). If he can convince one of these plaintiffs lawyers to do the case, he will do far better.

Great lawyers GO ON OFFENSE. Thus, Lindell needs to RESPOND NOW--and start the process...after motions that are pure law (not fact), then the discovery process can begin. Lindell states he wants discovery. OK--don't use the excuse he hasn't been served.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MSREDMAMA1

mari5212

New Member
Feb 23, 2021
11
3
3
On the other hand, BIG LAW has credibility with federal judges (because these firms usually hire prior law clerks for federal judges) and they are establishment. So he can hire a BIG LAW firm that is willing to take the case because they will get wide exposure and if successful WILL get more business. But BIG LAW is generally risk averse. HE SHOULD ALSO HIRE A TOP PLAINTIFFS LAWYER (Trump had plaintiff's lawyers in impeachment) to run the case and TRY THE CASE. He must get a lawyer who WINS TRIALS--BIG TRIALS-- THOSE ARE THE TRULY GREAT LAWYERS--they are creative and the antithesis of risk averse.
 

Susan M

Well-known Member
Feb 1, 2021
551
825
93
On the other hand, BIG LAW has credibility with federal judges (because these firms usually hire prior law clerks for federal judges) and they are establishment. So he can hire a BIG LAW firm that is willing to take the case because they will get wide exposure and if successful WILL get more business. But BIG LAW is generally risk averse. HE SHOULD ALSO HIRE A TOP PLAINTIFFS LAWYER (Trump had plaintiff's lawyers in impeachment) to run the case and TRY THE CASE. He must get a lawyer who WINS TRIALS--BIG TRIALS-- THOSE ARE THE TRULY GREAT LAWYERS--they are creative and the antithesis of risk averse.
JAY SEKULOW OR HIS SON IF THEY WOULD DO IT
 
  • Like
Reactions: MSREDMAMA1

Dip Stick

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2021
1,477
2,173
113
On the other hand, BIG LAW has credibility with federal judges (because these firms usually hire prior law clerks for federal judges) and they are establishment. So he can hire a BIG LAW firm that is willing to take the case because they will get wide exposure and if successful WILL get more business. But BIG LAW is generally risk averse. HE SHOULD ALSO HIRE A TOP PLAINTIFFS LAWYER (Trump had plaintiff's lawyers in impeachment) to run the case and TRY THE CASE. He must get a lawyer who WINS TRIALS--BIG TRIALS-- THOSE ARE THE TRULY GREAT LAWYERS--they are creative and the antithesis of risk averse.
Not sure what type of Attorneys Mike has hired, but I know that he has the BEST leader and guide! GOD
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lajo

War Room Live Chat

Hey Deplorable! Join us...

Never miss out. Join in on all that our community as to offer!

Sign Me Up!

Trending Today

War Room Podcast

War Room Live Chat