How do we reconcile the Navarro Report -- the Dems did it -- with the Lindell findings -- the CCP did it? I assume they complement each other but am struggling to explain it to friends and others.
I have tried to convince and explain it to MANY, but you have to be a SEEKER of TRUTH and willing to ask the hard questions or leaders and yourself. If they care they will dig in, I guess thats what I do!How do we reconcile the Navarro Report -- the Dems did it -- with the Lindell findings -- the CCP did it? I assume they complement each other but am struggling to explain it to friends and others.
Personally I like MIKE! Have bought his products before and will again. YES he could be more polished, BUT he's a 100% RealAs an arm chair critic on Lindell's delivery of the topic, it was apparent to me that his content was...yes important for sure but...his delivery was poorly done due to his "Over Anxious" personality. The video seemed to be edited in a rush meaning, it didn't flow evenly like the follow-up video on his site. I think he needs to redo the video with better Direction and without his excited rambling and waving of his body gestures. He needs a good narrator like Robert Clotworthy on Ancient Aliens/ Mystery of Oak Island...kinda set-up.??? What do you think??
Of-course...Most everyone either love's or believes Mike Lindell is the real deal...He's our "Pillow" guy but.....In a case that is soooo important....I feel he needs to take note and calm down with his bullet points. He needs to capture the people who are on the fence about the "F" word.Personally I like MIKE! Have bought his products before and will again. YES he could be more polished, BUT he's a 100% Real
We all drive cars...but only a few drive in the INDY 500...As an arm chair critic on Lindell's delivery of the topic, it was apparent to me that his content was...yes important for sure but...his delivery was poorly done due to his "Over Anxious" personality. The video seemed to be edited in a rush meaning, it didn't flow evenly like the follow-up video on his site. I think he needs to redo the video with better Direction and without his excited rambling and waving of his body gestures. He needs a good narrator like Robert Clotworthy on Ancient Aliens/ Mystery of Oak Island...kinda set-up.??? What do you think??
This is the original message that I was replying to: "How do we reconcile the Navarro Report -- the Dems did it -- with the Lindell findings -- the CCP did it? I assume they complement each other but am struggling to explain it to friends and others."The issue is that Mike is not an eloquent and sophisticated guy therefore he only captures the attention of some. He can be charismatic but not in this setting. Was it low budget and rushed? Yes. Could it be done better? Yes. My concern is that only the MAGA base is interested in watching it and only to confirm what we already know. To the rest, it comes across as not polished and therefore unreliable. One could easily tune out because they immediately see him as a clown, which is sad because I like the guy and I commend him for what he is doing. As a Clinician, I encounter a lot of guys like him...rushed, over eager, fast talking, fidgety. He needs to work on adapting to his intended audience, fine tune his delivery. Frank Gaffney as much as I love him, puts me to sleep. So we need someone in between. Navarro is great, in a Joe Pesci kind of way, but again, too fast, too hyper. The message is not necessarily the problem, it is the messenger. He could have produced it but picked someone else to present. In essence, he did his film the way he does his commercials, while he can sell a pillow, he is not the best to sell a fraud case.
You can cover the same story through different angles. European news are usually very good at this, say something happens in Gaza, they get the point of view from Israel. Followed by the point of view from Palestine. It's the same event. Mike used the foreign interference because clearly numbers are not his thing. And if Navarro had mixed the ccp stuff in his report, it would have diluted the impact of his numbers and charts. I call it focus. You can drive side by side, you are still going in the same direction.This is the original message that I was replying to: "How do we reconcile the Navarro Report -- the Dems did it -- with the Lindell findings -- the CCP did it? I assume they complement each other but am struggling to explain it to friends and others."
How do we reconcile the Navarro Report -- the Dems did it -- with the Lindell findings -- the CCP did it? I assume they complement each other but am struggling to explain it to friends and others.
Yes ccp is the puppet master, dems are the puppets, money is the strings.It's actually pretty simple, and I learned the answer from Epoch Times, partly through War Room, Miles Guo, etc. Gaffney's recent appearance on War Room nails it.
The CCP is solidly behind the Dems, meaning, they own the Dems. Not just the Dems but several Republicans too. The Dems work for the CCP.
The goal of the CCP is global domination. To get there, they need to get the USA out of the way. Hence the manufactured bioweapon pandemic, working in concert with traitors like Fauci at the Wuhan Lab, the financial dealings with monsters like the Bidens, Pelosis, Kemps, Raffenspergers, Cuomos, Clintons, Obamas, NBA, Wall Street, insert 1000 names here, etc.
Our existential threat is the CCP, but also creatures like the Bidens/Obamas/Clintons/Gates/Zuckerberg/Dorsey...etc. McConnell and his commie wife too, ditto Loeffler's husband, Harris's husband, Pelosi's husband, it's a very long list.
CCP=BLM=ANTIFA=DEMS=RINOS=CNN, etc., etc.
Well said; you nailed it best.Yes ccp is the puppet master, dems are the puppets, money is the strings.
If you cut the strings, you set the puppets free and you can grab them, then you get the master. It s like a multi level marketing scheme.
That would be an EXCELLENT show to see!!Bannon needs to have Navarro and Lindell on his show at the same time to discuss the CCP involvement and how it conflicts with and/or complements the Navarro Report. Also, the source of the data/graphics for the CCP manipulaton and why our intelligence services chose to ignore, or downplay, it -- especially DNI Ratcliffe.
Absolutely nailed it!!! That's why there should be term limits, limits on campaign contributions of $100 (that way no one can simply "buy" an election, or be "bought and paid for by foreign countries", and the complete elimination of "qualified immunity" for all elected officials and politicians. Let me know what you think of that idea?Yes ccp is the puppet master, dems are the puppets, money is the strings.
If you cut the strings, you set the puppets free and you can grab them, then you get the master. It s like a multi level marketing scheme.
I don't think companies should be allowed to donate to campaigns, it is a conflict of interest. Individuals up to 1000 couples up to 2500. No companies, zero. We elect them, we fund our candidate campaign. And we should get full disclosure as to where the money goes. I pay taxes in my town, they re obligated to tell me what they do with that money. Why can't I have that transparency from campaign as a donnor. If they can only get money through us little people maybe they will see more value in us. A $13 million campaign donation, you can't tell me is just that, there has to be strings attached. I am tired of all the cousin Vinny promised deals.Absolutely nailed it!!! That's why there should be term limits, limits on campaign contributions of $100 (that way no one can simply "buy" an election, or be "bought and paid for by foreign countries", and the complete elimination of "qualified immunity" for all elected officials and politicians. Let me know what you think of that idea?
I completely agree with that. Very well saidI don't think companies should be allowed to donate to campaigns, it is a conflict of interest. Individuals up to 1000 couples up to 2500. No companies, zero. We elect them, we fund our candidate campaign. And we should get full disclosure as to where the money goes. I pay taxes in my town, they re obligated to tell me what they do with that money. Why can't I have that transparency from campaign as a donnor. If they can only get money through us little people maybe they will see more value in us. A $13 million campaign donation, you can't tell me is just that, there has to be strings attached. I am tired of all the cousin Vinny promised deals.