Translithic Civilization

  • Join War Room Forum!

    Welcome Deplorable! Please take a moment to Sign Up for a free account so you can join in on the LIVE CHAT and forum DISCUSSIONS.

    Sign Up    Live Chat Login


MEAN BUSINESS

Member
Mar 2, 2021
98
88
18
It was actually only point 2 that mattered, while all the rest played a supporting role which allowed that to happen: Science: “a way of studying, understanding and ultimately changing the natural world, which gave the West (among other things) a major military advantage over the Rest”.


However, that has dead-ended due to the inability of social sciences in general, and especially political science, to make any genuine progress, because doing so would necessarily blow away all previously dominant religions and ideologies, or rather treat them as ore to be smelted, so that their concepts could be recycled from the perspective of the actual evolutionary ecologies that were the real basis of those previous ways of understanding the world. There could still be some genuine political "progress." However, that would have to work through the profound paradoxes that warfare was the oldest and best developed social science, whose success was based on backing up deceits with destruction, which then was the foundation to build a political economy in which success was based on enforced frauds.


The essential problem that the Western civilization faces is that its biggest bullies' bullshit social stories were able to continue to dominate the development of the potential of advancing science and technology, to channel the industrial revolution into paths based on astronomically amplified systems of legalized lies, backed by legalized violence, i.e. to build globalized systems of electronic fiat money frauds, backed up by the threat of the force of atomic bombs. Inside that REAL context, almost everything in this article above is grossly superficial, because the main thing that it does NOT do is go through a series of intellectual scientific revolutions, which are sufficient to enable political science to catch up to advances in physical sciences. The reasons for that are profound, and extremely paradoxical, which is why almost nobody is able and willing to go through those transformations in their perceptual paradigms, despite that changing paradigms does not change what exists, but only the ways that we perceive what exists, which then enables a better understanding of what EXISTS to RELATIVELY change what exists.


The basic problem is that progress in science was based upon better and better understanding of general energy systems. HOWEVER, that was NOT done to better understand the general energy systems of civilizations, because that would take profound paradigm shifts which would not be liked by either the ruling classes, nor the controlled opposition groups. Social pyramids operate with ruling classes that specialize in being dishonest and violent, while those they rule over become incompetent idiots that adapt to survive inside those systems of social slavery. In that context, the necessary changes to enable any more scientific societies make all other previous paradigm shifts, that were basic breakthroughs in physical sciences, look like child's play by comparison.


IF Western Civilization is going to survive (which seems improbable at the present time) then it will have to continue to advance science in much more radical ways, which will enable the development of a Translithic Civilization to supplant the current style of Neolithic Civilization. The core to that has to be the development of better understanding of the ways that the biggest bullies' bullshit social stories dominated the philosophy of science, the same as all other social enterprises. Around that transformation it would be able to have a radically different understanding of how to maintain the militarism that operated the murder systems, which backed up the monetary systems. The core concept to the improvement of the ways that human artificial selection operates are radically different death controls. The essence of any future social and political progress MUST be based upon understanding natural selection better, so that better understanding could be more scientifically applied to develop better systems of artificial selection. However, given how practically impossible that is from a practical political perspective, we are indeed getting "close to the endgame."


The basic problem has been significant progress in physical sciences, while nothing like that has been allowed to happen in political science. The primary reasons for that have been that the best developed social science was warfare, whose success was based upon deceits, which then became the foundation of economics, whose success was based upon frauds. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR WESTERN, OR GLOBALIZED, CIVILIZATION TO SURVIVE UNLESS IT MORE SCIENTIFICALLY WORKS ITS WAY THROUGH THOSE PARADOXES THAT SOCIAL SCIENCES WERE BASED UPON BACKING UP LIES WITH VIOLENCE, BECAUSE THEIR FOUNDATION WAS THE HUMAN MURDER SYSTEMS, WHICH BACKED UP THE MONEY SYSTEMS.



The article above is typical of the grossly superficial ways that political economy is usually presented in ways that deliberately ignore the environmental ecologies. The crucial problem that human civilization faces is that, since the murder systems backs up the money system, HOW can human beings operate better murder systems, after the progress in basic physical sciences has enabled the development of weapons of mass destruction that are trillions of times more powerful, and headed towards becoming quadrillions of times more powerful? In theory, we should apply the ways of thinking that made those sciences and technologies possible in order to transform Neolithic social pyramid systems into a Translithic style of civilization. It is NOT possible for human beings to survive developing better and better understanding of general energy systems, while they deliberately ignore what that means to human energy systems. The future, IF we survive to have one, must be achieved through a series of intellectual scientific revolutions, which apply to politics in general, and to the combined money/murder systems in particular.


That paradigm shift would NOT change what already exists, but it may enable changing how that develops in the future. It was always absurd to believe that science and technology could enable industrial revolutions that made human beings become orders of magnitude more powerful and capable, while those human beings could still continue to believe in dangerously obsolete religions and ideologies. The chronic political problems, amplified orders of magnitude by the progress in science and technology, could only be better resolved by developing more scientific societies. However, anything like that would have to based on radical transformations in philosophy of science, which were able to understand how and why the biggest bullies' bullshit dominated the previous development of the philosophy of science.


IF there is going to be a future for human civilization, then we MUST enable a creative synthesis of post-modernizing science with ancient mysticism. However, at the present time, apes with atomic bombs committing collective suicide seems the far more probable future for the human species, because, as is TYPICAL with Zero Hedge articles, this one above grossly understates the degree to which "Much of what we think we know isn’t necessarily so."

-Blair T. Longley
 
  • Like
Reactions: NvEric

NvEric

Senior Member
Feb 7, 2021
1,855
1,607
113
Nevada
Don't know what article you refer to, but, Yes, those who've accumulated the stuff called money do the wrongs things with it for the wrong purposes. The stuff called money is real in the same sense that we follow the laws of the arbitrary things called governments. In short, none have chosen our governments, nor have we agreed to be Ruled by money. We simply have been born into the system where control is severely lacking if any.

Money does not exist other than a promise that it does exist - gold and silver are not money nor anything else - they are just stuff given value by promises that they can be exchanged for something else. Money is a convenient device. The value of money is where people must say "My Time is More Valuable than What I get in Return"

Revolt and Revolution
 
  • Like
Reactions: MEAN BUSINESS

MEAN BUSINESS

Member
Mar 2, 2021
98
88
18
Don't know what article you refer to, but, Yes, those who've accumulated the stuff called money do the wrongs things with it for the wrong purposes. The stuff called money is real in the same sense that we follow the laws of the arbitrary things called governments. In short, none have chosen our governments, nor have we agreed to be Ruled by money. We simply have been born into the system where control is severely lacking if any.

Money does not exist other than a promise that it does exist - gold and silver are not money nor anything else - they are just stuff given value by promises that they can be exchanged for something else. Money is a convenient device. The value of money is where people must say "My Time is More Valuable than What I get in Return"

Revolt and Revolution

control is severely lacking if any

"It WAS "under control," only to the degree that lies backed by violence WAS able to maintain control. While that used to work throughout thousands of years of history, the social pyramid systems based on backing up lies with violence were never before amplified by science and technology to become many orders of magnitude BIGGER.


I agree that: "I do not think the American people have the ability to wake up and stop the destruction of the United States." However, I believe that the ruling classes that made and maintained the established systems, and are apparently carrying through their agenda, have become criminally insane, because they are NOT adapting to science and technology providing powers and capabilities that are trillions of times BIGGER. In my view, while there certainly was a conspiracy by the ruling classes to consolidate a globalized social pyramid system, there are no longer any groups of human beings who fully comprehend what is going on, and there are no longer any groups of human beings that are able to control what is going to happen."

- Blair T Longley

////////////////////

He said this seven years ago. DJT proved the statement "I do not think the American people have the ability to wake up and stop the destruction of the United States." wrong, but looked what happened to him and his supporters!
 

War Room Live Chat

Support War Room With a Small Donation
Donations pay for increased server capacity, Live Chat and patriots/causes that appear on the show.

Hey Deplorable! Join us...

Never miss out. Join in on all that our community as to offer!

Sign Me Up!

Trending Today

War Room Podcast

War Room Live Chat