A lot to unpack here,
@bannonfan thanks for the long reply!
maybe put your money where your mouth is, and complain on gettr instead of in here?
I'm not sure what you mean by this but:
1. I voiced these same concerns there prior to coming here but there's no real mechanism to do so. I posted a brief version of this thread in GETTR's Support account which was then replied (probably by some intern in India) with an automatic message telling me to send an email, which I did (twice) and never got a single reply.
2. I also posted a message saying I was leaving the platform (specifically because of the fact people can delete other peoples' posts) to my almost 600 followers which got 10 likes to my usual 1 or 2 per post.

As a very pertinent side note, from those almost 600 followers I can say one is a real human. That's it. So roughly-speaking, giving no one really comments on anything in a civilized manner (unlike you lovely peoples here), I would estimate at least 500 are bots. At least.
3. The point of complaining here is the proximity between Bannon's WarRoom and GETTR. Futile as it is, I'm doing this hoping it somehow might reach the proper set of ears. (It most likely won't, I know).
if you could help, you'd have contacted them.
Yes. I always add that part in all my emails too. I explicitly say they can contact me for any further feedback, help or assistance. (No replies so far).
if you don't like a program, either fix it, go elsewhere, or give them time to improve. all the beeching changes nada.
Well, that's also the thing, and allow me to reiterate:
GETTRs underlying base tech / software / program isn't bad at all. It's kind of buggy but as you said that is completely normal when first developing a platform. The app/site itself looks great and feels quite smooth.
That being said it DOES NOT work as a social-media platform. But it works GREAT as some kind of news-aggregator. People can post messages, links, short videos and so on but you cannot have any kind of meaningful interaction.
I know this is probably a bit confusing but follow me here:
1. The main basic software = GREAT
2. The social-media part of the software = ABSOLUTE DISASTER
3. Jason Miller (and Bannon) are selling GETTR as a "free-speech" social-media platform. And that is a very big part of the problem. The rest being the bot situation and the user-censorship situation.
i don't like the idea of deleting others, unless its pure abuse, but how can you have it both ways. either you give folks the right to delete or you hire 50 watchdogs..and the watchdogs are themselves suspect,
I see no great solution to this. If someone is full of hate, they will try to shut those up who disagree with their lifestyle and/or beliefs.
and the moderators are often like mother superiors, real stick up the blanks.
That is exactly one of the biggest challenges of running these kind of huge global social-media sites. #1 The actual infrastructure (servers and tech personnel) and #2 Moderation / moderators.
Now lets dissect what "Allowing people to delete other peoples' post" actual mean because this is crucial:
1. It automatically kills "free-speech". Period. No one looking for free-speech will ever use GETTR as long as that is the case.
2. Miller is selling GETTR as a bastion of FREE-SPEECH based on the notion that GETTR itself won't ever delete your content (which is also not true because they censor their platform exactly like Twitter does but based under a different set of rules).
3. All GETTR is doing by this is switching the blame of censoring something to the user instead of the platform itself.
As I said this is kind of brilliant because:
1. It requires a lot less personnel.
2. Miller/GETTR doesn't get blamed for censoring anything.
3. It literally turns GETTR into a GRIFTRs paradise.
This ruin the site for us (the users looking for free-speech) but benefits greatly anyone trying to milk MAGA.
In GETTR grifters are free to make an account for free, have thousands of bots praising everything they say (sell) and on top of that they can manually curate any kind of criticism, complains or dissent thus giving the completely false impression of being successful MAGA heroes if they want.
This is great for Miller's and the grifter's pockets but terrible for us (people looking for free-speech and honest political activism) and also downright dangerous for MAGA.
And that is basically why and how I ended up here wasting all this time trying to shine a light on all this.
if I had a wand I'd wave it and say explitives and name calling were grounds for expulsion, all else must be tolerated for ideas to freely flow.
In essence that is EXACTLY all you need to do. Easier said than done, of course, but basically a non-negotiable principle for hosting any kind of social-media platform. Specially one being sold under the "free-speech" mantra.